Reflecting on the Shame of College Sports: Should NCAA Div 1 Basketball and Football players get paid?

            The argument for paying collegiate athletes find its basis largely in the structure of athletic programs and the salaries of coaches, franchises, and media that own the players’ performances. Furthermore, these athletes spend their lives focusing on their abilities, yet they make no money. If collegiate sports did not make a profit, it would be more reasonable for players to compete without compensation. Additionally, competitors are putting their health and bodies at risk in order to participate while expecting nothing in return. The argument against paying college athletes emphasizes the nature of education as a privilege that requires dedication and hard work academically, rather than an advantage bestowed on those that will increase the university’s prestige and revenue. Athletes contribute to the spirit of the college, but should they be paid for simple athleticism as opposed to working toward their higher education?

            I believe collegiate athletes should be paid for their time and lifestyle commitments, as well as the risk to their personal health. However, these ‘salaries’ should be capped to ensure the franchise is not over-paying for talent that has no other contribution to the university itself. Furthermore, these players receiving compensation for their athletic contribution should also meet certain requirements, such as maintaining a substantial GPA and participating in additional programs through the university. While I believe athletes deserve payment for their commitment, it should not be bestowed based solely on participation in an athletic program.